Denver Broncos vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats
When you search Denver Broncos vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats, you usually want one thing fast: who played best, and what the numbers really say. This matchup has given fans drama, big throws, tough runs, and game-turning defense. In this guide, I’m going to break down the most recent Broncos–Commanders game with clear tables and simple explanations. You will see passing yards, rushing totals, top receivers, key tackles, and the plays that decided the score. I’ll also compare it to their memorable 2023 meeting, so you can spot patterns and player growth. If you like football but hate messy stat pages, you’re in the right place. Everything here is written to be easy to read, even if you are new to box scores.
Quick game snapshot (most recent matchup)
The most recent head-to-head game finished with Denver winning 27–26 in overtime against Washington on November 30, 2025. This is the game most people mean when they search Denver Broncos vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats today. The score shows a tight battle, but the stats show something deeper. Denver leaned on steady passing volume and timely scoring, while Washington fought back with long drives and strong third-down efforts. The ending was pure pressure football. Washington scored a touchdown in overtime, then tried a two-point pass to win, but the play failed, and Denver escaped. If you want the “who did what” story, the next sections will make it very clear.
Table 1: Team score by quarter (2025 game)
This table helps you understand the flow of the game without watching every snap. Denver started with points, built a lead, then went quiet in the fourth quarter before winning in overtime. Washington stayed close, then forced extra time with late scoring. These shifts matter because they explain why some players had bigger second-half workloads. They also show why late-game decision-making becomes a huge part of player value. When fans talk about momentum, this is the simplest proof. It also helps you judge whether a quarterback’s stats came in calm moments or under pressure. And in this matchup, pressure was everywhere by the end.
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | OT | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denver Broncos | 3 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 27 |
| Washington Commanders | 0 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 26 |
Denver passing stats: Bo Nix set the tempo.
In the Denver Broncos vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats, the passing line often tells the “control” story. Denver quarterback Bo Nix completed 29 of 45 passes for 321 yards, with 1 touchdown and 1 interception. That is a high-volume day, and it shows Denver trusted him to keep the offense moving. The yards per attempt were not wild, but the consistency mattered. He kept feeding targets, taking short wins, and using the middle of the field. One sack for a loss of six yards also shows the protection held up most of the night. When you combine 321 passing yards with a close finish, it usually means the quarterback had to earn every first down. That’s exactly what happened here.
Washington passing stats: Mariota’s heavy workload.
Washington quarterback Marcus Mariota also had a big workload. He finished 28 of 50 for 294 yards, with 2 touchdowns and 1 interception. Fifty attempts are a lot, and it tells you Washington threw often, especially when chasing points and managing the clock. His average yards per pass were lower than Denver’s, but he still created scoring chances. The two sacks for 18 yards lost show Denver’s rush got home a few times, but not enough to shut down the passing plan. For fans searching for Denver Broncos vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats, this is a key takeaway: Mariota’s numbers came with real pressure, and he still led an overtime touchdown drive.
Table 2: Quarterback comparison (2025 game)
This table is a quick “who won the QB day” snapshot. It does not tell the whole story, but it helps you compare volume, efficiency, and mistakes. A single interception can swing a game, but so can a single touchdown throw. In a one-point finish, every small stat becomes a great detail. Also, attempts matter because they show who had to carry more of the offense. Washington asked Mariota to throw five more times than Denver asked Nix. Denver, meanwhile, mixed in enough rushing touchdowns to keep the balance near the goal line. If you only look at yards, it seems close. If you look at touchdowns and game control, it gets more interesting.
| QB | Team | C/ATT | Yards | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bo Nix | Broncos | 29/45 | 321 | 1 | 1 |
| Marcus Mariota | Commanders | 28/50 | 294 | 2 | 1 |
Denver rushing stats: RJ Harvey delivered the finish
Rushing stats often hide the biggest story. In this game, Denver’s running back RJ Harvey posted 13 carries for 35 yards, but the huge part is the 2 rushing touchdowns. That means he did the hard job: finishing drives near the goal line. Not every rushing day needs 120 yards to matter. Sometimes the value is in the red zone, when the defense knows you want to run, and you still score. Denver also got support runs from Jaleel McLaughlin with 6 for 24, and a few from Nix and others to keep Washington honest. When people search for Denver Broncos vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats, Harvey’s two scores belong near the top.
Washington rushing stats: Mariota leads, Rodriguez scores
Washington’s rushing line has a surprising headline: Mariota led the team with 55 rushing yards on 10 carries. That usually means the quarterback had to create outside structure, either on designed keepers or smart scrambles. The main touchdown on the ground came from Chris Rodriguez Jr., who ran 11 times for 41 yards and scored 1 rushing touchdown. Washington also got steady help from Jeremy McNichols with 6 for 30, plus a few carries from others. Overall, Washington totaled 143 rushing yards as a team, which is strong. In a one-point loss, that rushing success makes the final stop feel even more painful for fans.
Table 3: Rushing leaders (2025 game)
Rushing tables are great because they show style. A 5.5 average from a quarterback suggests space and timing. A 3.7 average from a power back suggests tough yards. In this game, Washington’s best rushing “efficiency” came from the quarterback, while Denver’s best rushing “value” came from touchdowns. That contrast is common in close games. One team runs to control the clock and create safe downs. The other team runs to finish drives. Both matter. The numbers below make it simple to compare.
| Player | Team | Carries | Yards | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcus Mariota | Commanders | 10 | 55 | 5.5 | 0 |
| Chris Rodriguez Jr. | Commanders | 11 | 41 | 3.7 | 1 |
| RJ Harvey | Broncos | 13 | 35 | 2.7 | 2 |
| Jeremy McNichols | Commanders | 6 | 30 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Jaleel McLaughlin | Broncos | 6 | 24 | 4.0 | 0 |
Denver receiving stats: Engram and Sutton led the air attack
For anyone typing Denver Broncos vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats, the receiving chart is where the game becomes real. Denver tight end Evan Engram led the team with 6 catches for 79 yards on 9 targets. That is a classic “move the chains” stat line. Wide receiver Courtland Sutton added 5 catches for 62 yards and a touchdown. Denver spread the ball well after that, with Adam Trautman (3 for 47) and Pat Bryant (3 for 42) providing important support. This balance matters because defenses can’t key on one name. It also shows Nix was reading the field and taking what Washington gave him.
Washington receiving stats: Ertz was the volume king
Washington’s receiving totals were led by tight end Zach Ertz, who caught 10 passes for 106 yards on 13 targets. That is a true “security blanket” game. When a quarterback throws 50 times, he needs a reliable option, and Ertz filled that role. Wide receiver Terry McLaurin added 7 catches for 96 yards and a touchdown on 14 targets. Washington also got Treylon Burks scoring a touchdown with 1 catch for 5 yards, which shows how single plays can matter more than volume. In a game this tight, a few extra yards after catch, or one fewer drop, can change everything.
Table 4: Top receiving lines (2025 game)
This table highlights the “who did the most with the most chances” story. Targets matter because they show trust. Yards matter because they show impact. Touchdowns matter because they change the scoreboard. When you combine all three, you get the true leaders of the day. In this matchup, Washington’s top two options had massive target counts. Denver’s leaders had fewer targets but strong efficiency. That difference often appears when one team is chasing points. Also, notice how the tight ends were central for both teams. That tells you the middle of the field was open, and quarterbacks leaned on it.
| Player | Team | Targets | Receptions | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zach Ertz | Commanders | 13 | 10 | 106 | 0 |
| Terry McLaurin | Commanders | 14 | 7 | 96 | 1 |
| Evan Engram | Broncos | 9 | 6 | 79 | 0 |
| Courtland Sutton | Broncos | 6 | 5 | 62 | 1 |
Defense and tackles: who did the dirty work (2025 game)
Defense is where close games get decided. Denver safety Talanoa Hufanga led the Broncos with 13 total tackles. That’s a huge number, and it suggests Washington tested the middle, forcing him to clean up plays. Denver edge rusher Nik Bonitto recorded a sack and also made the late game-saving play on the two-point attempt, which is why his impact felt bigger than one stat line. On Washington’s side, linebacker Bobby Wagner had 8 total tackles and made a key interception. These are the kinds of details fans miss when they only read the final score. If you want Denver Broncos vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats that feel meaningful, start with tackles and takeaways.
Turnovers and interceptions: the swing moments (2025 game)
Interceptions are the loudest defensive stat. Denver recorded one interception by Dre Greenlaw, returned for 27 yards. Washington also recorded one interception, made by Bobby Wagner, returned for 6 yards. With one pick each, the game stayed balanced, which matches the one-point finish. Also important: the fumble section shows no lost fumbles for either team in the ESPN box score summary, which means both teams protected the ball in key moments. That’s why the ending came down to execution, not a late giveaway. In many games, turnovers decide everything. Here, the teams traded one major takeaway each, then battled through overtime like it was a playoff test.
Special teams stats: kickers quietly stayed perfect (2025 game)
Special teams can win or lose close games, and both kickers delivered. Denver’s Wil Lutz went 2-for-2 on field goals and 3-for-3 on extra points. Washington’s Jake Moody also went 2-for-2 on field goals and 2-for-2 on extra points. In a one-point game, a single missed kick changes the entire story. Punting was steady as well. Denver punter Jeremy Crawshaw averaged 45.3 yards on 4 punts, while Washington’s Tress Way averaged 42.3 and pinned two punts inside the 20. These details matter because field position helped shape late drives and overtime.
“Real-life” fan takeaway: how to read these stats fast
Here’s a simple way to use Denver Broncos vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats like a pro, without getting overwhelmed. First, check the quarterback lines. Serious attempts usually mean one team chased points. Next, look at rushing touchdowns. They tell you who won near the goal line. Then, look at the top two receivers by targets and yards. That shows where the offense lived. Finally, check interceptions and kicker accuracy. Those are the “game-flip” stats. If you do these four steps, you’ll understand 80% of the game in two minutes. It’s a great habit for fantasy players, bettors, and casual fans.
Bonus context: the unforgettable 2023 matchup stats (35–33)
Many fans still talk about the September 17, 2023, meeting, when Washington beat Denver 35–33. In that game, Washington QB Sam Howell threw for 299 yards with 2 touchdowns and 0 interceptions. Denver QB Russell Wilson threw for 308 yards, 3 touchdowns, and 1 interception. Washington’s Brian Robinson Jr. ran for 87 yards and scored two rushing touchdowns. That 2023 stat profile looks similar to 2025 in one way: both games were close, and both had a big “finish-drive” rushing story. If you compare them side by side, you’ll see how Denver’s style shifted from deep touchdown passes to more balanced, controlled drives.
Table 5: 2023 quarterback and rushing highlights (quick)
| Category | Broncos (2023) | Commanders (2023) |
|---|---|---|
| QB | Russell Wilson: 308 pass yds, 3 TD, 1 INT | Sam Howell: 299 pass yds, 2 TD, 0 INT |
| Top rusher | Team rushing total: 122 yds | Brian Robinson Jr.: 87 yds, 2 TD |
What these stats say about both teams (simple truth)
Stats should answer real questions. In the 2025 game, Denver’s offense leaned on steady passing volume and trusted the run game to finish drives. Washington leaned on heavy passing volume plus strong rushing support from the quarterback, then tried to win aggressively in overtime. That kind of choice tells you Washington believed they could get one more perfect play. Denver’s defense held just enough, with leaders like Hufanga stacking tackles and Greenlaw making the key interception. If you only remember the final score, you miss the real story. The real story is execution in high-pressure downs, where one stop or one score becomes everything.
FAQs
1) What are the most searched Denver Broncos vs Washington Commanders match player stats?
The most searched lines are usually the quarterback stats, top rushers, and top receivers. In the Nov 30, 2025, game, Bo Nix threw for 321 yards, while Marcus Mariota threw for 294 yards. Fans also look for scoring backs, and RJ Harvey’s two rushing touchdowns stand out for Denver. In Washington, Zach Ertz led all receivers with 106 yards.
2) Who had the best passing performance in the 2025 matchup?
If you go by yards, Bo Nix had the bigger day with 321 passing yards. If you go by touchdowns, Marcus Mariota threw two passing touchdowns, which is more. Both threw one interception. The simplest way to explain it is this: Denver’s passing was slightly more efficient, and Washington’s passing had heavier volume and more scoring through the air.
3) Who were the top receivers for Denver and Washington?
Denver’s top receiver by yards was tight end Evan Engram with 79 yards. Courtland Sutton led Denver in receiving touchdowns with one. Washington’s top yardage receiver was Zach Ertz with 106 yards, and Terry McLaurin scored a receiving touchdown and gained 96 yards.
4) Who scored the key touchdowns in the 2025 game?
For Denver, RJ Harvey scored two rushing touchdowns, including the overtime score that put Denver ahead. Courtland Sutton also scored a receiving touchdown. For Washington, Chris Rodriguez Jr. scored a rushing touchdown, while Terry McLaurin and Treylon Burks were credited with receiving touchdowns.
5) What were the biggest defensive stats in the 2025 matchup?
Each team had one interception. Denver’s pick came from Dre Greenlaw and went for 27 return yards. Washington’s interception came from Bobby Wagner. Denver also had key tackle volume, with Talanoa Hufanga leading at 13 total tackles.
6) Why do people keep searching this matchup’s player stats?
Because these teams tend to produce close, dramatic games that swing on a few key players. The 2025 game ended 27–26 in OT, and the 2023 game ended 35–33. Close scores make every stat feel important. Fans want to know who stepped up, who struggled, and what to expect next time.
Conclusion
If you came here for the Denver Broncos vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats, the big picture is simple: the most recent game was decided by small edges. Denver got steady passing yardage, strong red-zone rushing touchdowns, and just enough defense to survive overtime. Washington matched the fight with heavy passing volume, top-tier receiving production from Ertz and McLaurin, and a defense that created a takeaway too. In the end, one late stop mattered more than any single yard. If you want, tell me which matchup year you want next (2025 or 2023), and I’ll create an even deeper “every starter” stats table version for that game.
You Also Like To Read: Florida Woman Wins Monopoly Lottery